Mar. 15th, 2008

ricardienne: (Default)
So, on [livejournal.com profile] penmage's recommendation (and because she provided a free link to it here, I'm reading Jo Walton's Farthing. It is made of all good elements: British country house party murder mystery (just like Agatha Christie), alternate history (Britain made peace with Hitler), moderately interesting characters. I'm enjoying it lots. But one thing is sticking out: a conspicuous absence, if you will. Actually, it isn't that conspicuously absent, just a bit around the edges. There's a bit of Shakespeare and Biblical quotation happening by the characters, which is good, but there's just about no classical quoting, and I'm missing it. The MC has a cute little system for talking obliquely about sexual orientation in terms of antiquity, and given that everyone is British upper class public school cum Oxbridge educated, I find myself expecting Virgil or Horace of Cicero, or SOMEONE.

It's interesting, because one of the things I love about Anthony Trollope (the only other thing I've read of Walton's is Tooth and Claw which is a rewrite of Trollope with dragons as the main characters, that possibly fails on just this count, now that I think about it) is the amount of allusion he makes just as a narrator. And I actually don't remember whether this (by which I now mean Farthing again) sort of novel does that; I want to say that Dorothy Sayers and Josephine Tey do have characters making learned references, but I'm not sure. And certainly, I may be being extra sensitive to this right now because I am only putting up with Horace on the grounds that he is of Extreme Cultural Importance. And so I want the vindication by finding him. Would a dulce et decorum est, even if it comes courtesy of Wilfred Owen, be too much to ask? Well, I still have quite a few chapters to go.

ETA: Does a reference to President Lindberg mean that this is the same alt-universe as The Plot Against American (which I haven't read)?

ETA2: Finished. I MUST HAVE THE SEQUEL. NOW. Poor Carmichael.
ricardienne: (Default)
So tonight, John Crowne's Regulus (c. 1694). In many ways, this is the best of the three I've read (obviously, Havard's was no-contest awful, but Crowne's is better than More's, I think, in some ways). For one thing, Crowne takes up the Polybian tradition, and starts in Carthage, where, once we finally meet him, Regulus is overambitious and over-confident; ignoring everyone's advice and escalating bad omens (including multiple appearances of his dead wife's ghost) in his arrogance. For another, the Carthaginians, far from being Evil Villainous Types are embroiled in their own power struggles to save/get control of their city.

The first two acts are completely taken up with Carthaginian politics, where wicked-demagogue Asdrubal is trying to stage a coup against decent-prince Hamilcar (whose daughter Elisa is in love with the noble Spartan mercenary captain Xanthippus); commentary, political manouvering, and comedy is provided by the Corrupt Priest, Snobbish Noble, and Grasping Merchant-type (I forget their names, but it's never hard to tell who's talking; it's also pretty clear that this is all satire on English court/clergy/etc., although I don't know enough to pick out the particular references. On the other hand, there is also a strong anti-populist current going on: I really need to learn more this period and its politics, I think.). This is much more successful, though, than Havard's extremely pathetic attempts at Roman politics and conspiracy.

When we finally get to the Roman camp, Fulvia, Regulus' new fiancée who is inexplicably hanging out in an army camp along with her father the proconsul, is moping and worrying about her lover, on the grounds that someone as perfect as Regulus is doomed to an early death. Lepidus arrives and tries to reason with here. They talk for a while, and finally Fulvia mentions the rather good reasons she has: earthquakes, ghosts, mysterious eclipses. This is going to become a theme: no one ever seems to mention the obvious reasons for anything before they have exhausted debate on the trivial ones.

So Regulus goes off to fight, and then we get back to Carthage, where Asdrubal stages his coup, then offers to spare Hamilcar if his daughter will marry him. Hamilcar, being the upright Roman Carthaginian that he is, will have none of her betraying her engagement to the equally upright Xanthippus, but Elisa plans to stage a murder-suicide at the altar, and agrees. Just as we are starting to wonder why the play is entitled "Regulus" Xanthippus arrives, having, under Hamilcar's orders, tricked and captured Regulus. Asdrubal is captured, the coup is averted, all of the satiricals punished and Xanthippus and Elisa reunited. After a momentary "damn, where did we put Regulus," Hamilcar goes off to deal with him, since Xanthippus and Elisa are clearly being too lovey-dovey to do anything useful. Until, that is, Xanthippus hears that Regulus has been chained in dungeon; then he ditches his bride-to-be to go off and demand better treatment for his noble and amazing captive. Eventually the Regulus-as-ambassador is proposed -- Crowne has him just embassying to the Roman camp, which keeps him on the better side of history, I suppose.

But first we have another bizarre scene in the prison, where Snobbish Noble, Asdrubal, and Corrupt Priest are planning to buy their way out and getting drunk until Snobbish Noble's wife shows up, reveals that she's actually in love with Asdrubal, and curses out her husband for having betrayed Asdrubal in a last-ditch attempt to save himself. Then she flounces out. Some Senators come in, annoyed at the high-handed way Xanthippus has been managing his prisoner, and offer power to Asdrubal. He promptly turns on his former accomplices.

And then we finally get to Regulus' big scene. Once he's captured, unfortunately, Regulus reverts to type and becomes noble, stoic, and unyielding in the good Roman way. Lepidus sics Fulvia on him, in the standard last-ditch attempt to save the life of noble self-sacrificing commander. Regulus pretends he's been poisoned; it convinces everyone except Fulvia, who flips out, until Regulus' first wife's ghost appears and makes her faint so Regulus can get away.

Meanwhile, Asdrubal's second coup is quashed again. Regulus comes back. The Carthaginian senate wants to torture him; his admirer Xanthippus protests and storms out. Fulvia shows up leading a sortie of Romans whome Xanthippus has let in, but she is just in enough time to watch Regulus die from his torture. Fulvia suddenly goes mad and starts raving. Xanthippus, Elisa, and Hamilcar go off to Sparta to live happily ever after, taking Fulvia with them. The end.

So this one had comedy, crazy melodrama, true love, and speeches about Roman Virtue. The only thing it doesn't have is arguments about who gets to stand up in whose presence, which is a bit unfortunate. Overall, though, the best Regulus play so far. (I still have Jacob Jones, which the introduction to the Crowne claims is unspeakably bad, so it should very entertaining.)

Profile

ricardienne: (Default)
sigaloenta

October 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 12:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »